Is the 60/40 Portfolio Drowning? Or put another way...why buy bonds?
Updated: May 27, 2022
A review of average rates of returns for set portfolios and a glimpse at why the Quantum e3 model may be a better mouse trap.
(These are some recent pundits/ MSM headlines.) “The 60/40 Portfolio Is Dead” (January 25, 2022)… ”Why a 60/40 Portfolio Is No Longer Good Enough” (August 12, 2020)… “Time for FAs to Rethink Portfolio Construction Rules: Execs” (May 13, 2022)… ”Traditional 60/40 portfolio has actually reached its expiration date” (September 2, 2021). Is it time to revisit the 60/40 Portfolio? Apparently, some think so. This is just a sampling of the recent headlines surrounding the 60/40 portfolio, which has historically been regarded as a reliable best practice for long-term investors. Made up of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, the 60/40 portfolio is designed to capture the best of both worlds: equities’ growth potential and stable income from bonds. When stocks are in a bull market, the 60/40 portfolio is poised to take advantage of rising stock prices. In times when stocks fall out of favor, its 40% bond allocation can offer some downside protection.
But so far, 2022 has been an unusual year.
At the time of writing, both the NASDAQ and S&P 500 have entered bear market territory and the fixed income-tracking Bloomberg US Aggregate Index has drawn down more than 10%. Since 2022 is taking a toll on both its equity and fixed income segments, is it fair to call the 60/40 portfolio dead? Exactly how well is the hallmark strategy doing, anyways? Let’s look at some data…and then lets look at if any of this matters. Historical Performance of the 60/40 Portfolio vs. Other Asset Classes A 60/40 Sample Portfolio, constructed using Vanguard mutual funds and rebalanced annually, has regularly split the field of asset class performance (as it’s intended to do) over the last 10 years. (Allocations: 35% in Vanguard’s Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX); 20% in Total International Stock Index (VGTSX); 5% in Emerging Markets Stock Index (VEIEX); 30% in Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX); and 10% in Short-Term Bond Index (VBISX)) Over the past 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, the 60/40 Sample Portfolio’s performance landed right in the middle of all other asset classes. In the last month, three months, and year-to-date in 2022, the 60/40 Sample Portfolio has held its relative middle-of-the-road performance, despite every asset class except Commodities being in the red.
Download Visual A similar trend can be seen through the lens of calendar year performance. Though the annual performance of the 60/40 Sample Portfolio has varied a little dating back to 2012, it has still delivered relatively steady returns. This includes 2022 YTD which, despite the 60/40 strategy delivering a negative -13.5% return, currently sits in a better place than any of the six equity asset classes listed in the table.
Download Visual What Portfolio Allocations Might Have Limited Even More Downside Risk? With the exception of Commodities, investors have had nowhere to hide in 2022. While bonds haven’t offered much stability as of late, history shows that a greater fixed income allocation would have made down years more palatable, albeit while diminishing portfolio returns. In fact, only the All-Bond Sample Portfolio eked out positive returns in 2015 and 2018.
Download Visual As is expected, portfolios with greater equity allocations also carry a track record of higher standard deviations (meaning more volatility). But note that while the All Stock and All Bond Sample Portfolios have sported higher standard deviations in recent years, the 60/40 Sample Portfolio is extremely consistent over the last decade in terms of volatility.
Download Visual Is the 60/40 portfolio “dead”, as some suggest? Like most asset classes, the 60/40 portfolio is having a gloomy 2022 so far. However, as the data shows, the majority of asset classes have fared worse during this bear market. Individual asset classes tend to ebb and flow over time, posting some great years and some not-so-great years. The 60/40 strategy, however, appears to continue finding itself right in the middle of the pack with each flip of the calendar, as intended by its design. The question you need to ask yourself is, if your timeframe is long, why worry about short term volatility when by hedging your risk you cut your long term returns in 1/3.
Fortunately at Quantum Private Wealth we have an answer to this question. Its not a fixed 60/40 portfolio nor is it a 70/30 or a 20/ 80. It is our e3 model. Create a plan, an income stream and invest for the future. Reach out to us to learn how you can stop looking at your portfolio in terms of a fixed ratio and instead use our e3 model to empower, enhance and elevate your life.
Thanks to YCharts for the above information.
Disclaimer ©2022 YCharts, Inc. All Rights Reserved. YCharts, Inc. (“YCharts”) is not registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or with the securities regulatory authority or body of any state or any other jurisdiction) as an investment adviser, broker-dealer or in any other capacity, and does not purport to provide investment advice or make investment recommendations. This report has been generated through application of the analytical tools and data provided through ycharts.com and is intended solely to assist you or your investment or other adviser(s) in conducting investment research. You should not construe this report as an offer to buy or sell, as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or trade, any security or other financial instrument. For further information regarding your use of this report, please go to: ycharts.com/about/disclosure
Nothing contained herein shall constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Material in this publication is original or from published sources and is believed to be accurate. However, we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of such information and assume no liability for any resulting damages. Readers are cautioned to consult their own tax and investment professionals with regard to their specific situations. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Please remember to contact Quantum Private Wealth, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you want to impose, add, modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services, or if you wish to direct that Quantum Private Wealth effect any specific transactions for your account. Please be advised that there can be no assurance that any email request will be reviewed and/or acted upon on the day it is received-please be guided accordingly. A copy of our current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees continues to remain available for your review upon request. Securities offered through Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments, Member FINRA/SIPC Headquartered at 80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207. Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments and Quantum Private Wealth are not affiliated companies.